Catherine Rampell, writing for The Washington Post:
Here’s the problem with suggesting that upsetting speech warrants
“safe spaces,” or otherwise conflating mere words with physical
assault: If speech is violence, then violence becomes a
justifiable response to speech.
Just ask college students. A fifth of undergrads now say it’s
acceptable to use physical force to silence a speaker who makes
“offensive and hurtful statements.”
That’s one finding from a disturbing new survey of students
conducted by John Villasenor, a Brookings Institution senior
fellow and University of California at Los Angeles professor.
Even worse, a large segment of them fundamentally do not understand the First Amendment:
For example, when students were asked whether the First Amendment
protects “hate speech,” 4 in 10 said no. This is, of course,
incorrect. Speech promoting hatred — or at least, speech
perceived as promoting hatred — may be abhorrent, but it is
nonetheless constitutionally protected.
This notion equating speech with violence is more than just an irritation. It’s ammunition for the right to shut down legitimate protest. It’s self-defeating for people on the left to take this stance. Sticks and stones, folks.